Katherine Sebov vs Gabriela Lee Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Which player is more reliable under the pressure of their second serve: Lee or Sebov? Over the past six months, Lee has demonstrated a stronger prowess on this front, securing 42.45% of her second serve points compared to Sebov's 37.54%. This figure consistently proves to be a significant indicator when predicting match outcomes, suggesting that Lee might have an edge when it comes to second serve situations.

Now consider the return game. How do these players fare when returning their opponent's serves? Recently, Sebov has excelled in this area, winning 51.04% of points on her opponent's second serves, while Lee managed 45.74%. When it comes to first serve returns, Sebov leads again, with a 39.22% success rate versus Lee’s 31.55%. This indicates Sebov's formidable skill in return games, potentially giving her an advantage in their face-off.

Saving breakpoints can be the clincher in tight matches. Lee has shown greater resilience, saving 49% of breakpoints, slightly better than Sebov’s 45.92%. This can provide Lee with a mental edge in pressure-packed moments, often influencing live betting predictions.

What about their overall performance over the last year? Lee and Sebov have contrasting win rates. Lee has won exactly 50% (23 wins and 23 losses), while Sebov has a superior win rate of 58.18% (32 wins and 23 losses). This broader matchup overview tips the scales slightly in favor of Sebov.

Favorable surfaces tell a detailed story. Lee excels on clay with a 60% win rate, whereas grass seems to be her Achilles' heel, winning just 20% of matches. Sebov, on the other hand, finds her stride on indoor hard courts with an impressive 68% success rate but is more vulnerable on grass despite winning half her matches there.

Examining their head-to-head matchups, Lee has maintained an upper hand, winning their only encounter at W 100 Bonita Springs 2019 quite decisively in two straight sets, underscoring her ability to handle Sebov directly in a competitive setting. Both players are yet to engage in a tiebreak or deciding set against each other, leaving unanswered questions about their performance under extreme pressure against one another.

When analyzing the caliber of opponents faced, Lee has encountered slightly tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 348.09 compared to Sebov’s 376.95. If their upcoming match stretches into a deciding set, Sebov seems slightly better prepared, winning 57% of these situations compared to Lee’s 50% in recent games.

Both athletes have displayed a comparable ability to convert breakpoints, with Lee slightly ahead converting 40.54% of opportunities versus Sebov’s 39.41%. Nevertheless, Lee’s historical win over Sebov, combined with slightly superior stats in critical areas like breakpoint saving and second serve points, suggest a narrow win for Lee given the data at hand. Her slight advantage in breakpoint conversion and her past victory could be pivotal in unfolding this anticipated rematch.